A few days ago, it was revealed that Lloyds Banking Group can take back part of the one and a half million pound bonus offered to its CEO. As a state-backed bank, Lloyds has the flexibility to do this. However, it has also created a controversy with other banks and the bonuses they have offered to their executives.
Critics are placing a lot of pressure on other banks to consider revoking the bonuses issued to their executives as well. Following the scandals many banks have participated in regarding the payment protection insurance mis-sellings, many people feel sickened by the idea that banking executives should take bonuses.
Lloyds may be the crack in the dam that will cause other banks to cave in on the pressure. Considering the British government owns nearly half of Lloyds Banking Group, the bonus to CEO Eric Daniels is more concerning to them. The bank posted an end of the year loss after it was required to set aside 3.2 billion pounds to compensate customers who had been missold PPI packages. British taxpayers are particularly upset that they are being asked to pay a bonus to the CEO of a bank that has not only engaged in controversial PPI sellings, but has also failed to post a profit.
This may be the first time a major lender has considered withholding compensation to an executive. However, this is a serious case and customer tensions are high. Anthony Watson is coordinating the remuneration committee. Watson realizes the need to conduct a thorough investigation and consider all aspects of a decision.
Daniels’s bonus is intended to be paid out through shares of stock. According to FSA rules, these shares will not be available to him for another 15 months. Therefore, any part of the bonus that has not yet been paid out may be revoked at any time. After considering all implications and ensuring any decision is in lines with the policies of the FSA, the board of the remuneration commission will announce a decision.
Of course, a number of critics argue that it was inappropriate to pay Daniels a bonus at all. The previous Treasury spokesman, Lord Oakeshott, has said that bonuses paid to other executives should be reevaluated and possibly revoked as well. Oakeshott said that it is appalling that any chief executive “responsible for this gross consumer mis-selling scandal should have been paid a bonus.”
Lloyd’s chairman, Sir Win Bischoff, was the first to bring up the possibility of revoking the bonuses paid to Daniels and the other Lloyd executives. The remuneration board has not announced a date of a possible decision, but one is anticipated in the near future.